Why would an international trade economist like David Ricardo have thought that the United States would and should become a very large almost entirely agrarian civilization--a giant Canada? It was clear by 1900 that David Ricardo was wrong? Why was he wrong?
Perhaps it had something to do with the physiocratic view of the production of wealth?
ReplyDeleteFor those who haven't had the wonderful opportunity of an historical economics class:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physiocrats